Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake

When a few friends gifted me The Interpreter of Maladies in 2001, I was thrilled. Reading a latest, prize-winning novel was a luxury not many of us had experienced. I read through the book, quickly and hopefully. I loved the first story, but as I kept reading, I was steadily dejected. I did not recommend the book to anyone, like I mostly did with books I read. I always replied luke-warmly when anyone asked me about the book. I didn’t know what it was that I did not see that others did.

After I finished reading The Namesake over the weekend, I read the online reviews and kept coming across words like – “subtle”, “riveting”, “touching”, “saga.” I would not have used these words to describe the book. Yet again, I am perplexed what these reviewers find enthralling about a book that only left me mildly touched. To Lahiri’s credit, I ravaged the book in a few days – I am a slow reader. But the book was a simple read, in spite of having lengthy chapters. It spans over thirty years, yet is not in anyway like other stories that span that time. Reviewers have called it a coming to age story, but Gogol’s bildgunsroman escapes me, just like the fact that the book does not receive one true protagonist. The story begins from the point of view of Ashima Ganguli, a newlywed young woman, having had to leave her home country and settle in Boston with her doctoral student husband. Soon Ashima gives birth to their son, who in a contingency gets the name of Gogol, his father’s favorite Russian writer. Hence, the premise of the story, the namesake. The book, for me, was truly enjoyable when it was through the eyes of Ashima. Her ruptured life in the US, her struggle to make a home in a foreign land, her homesickness, was truly something I could identify and empathize with. But as Gogol begins to grow up, the narrative shifts to focus into him, and suddenly Ashima is forgotten, and seen through the eyes of this ungrateful son.

Okay, so I have to admit, I didn’t really warm up to Gogol. He is self-centered, confused, and does not show many signs of maturing. He dislikes his parents, hates even talking to them. I found it hard to believe that Gogol’s discomfiture is only due to the fact that his parents are not “American.” Children, during adolescence, do hate their parents. But a son who perpetually avoids his parents seems like an anomaly in himself, not worth the heavy burden of being a central character. Lahiri does not explore why Gogol is so dissatisfied with his life. The Gangulis as a family seem dysfunctional for no apparent reason, making the reader feel like Ashima and Ashoke’s arranged marriage might be the reason why no one in their family is happy.

What bothered me most, was that in spite of having read 290 odd pages about the Ganguli family, not a single character was completely exposed, not one character seen in depth, not one character laid out bare for me to dissect. Maybe that does not happen in many other books, but sometimes a writer can say more by not saying. But Lahiri does not do that.

Habitually, it is tougher for me to critique a book negatively. I love literature related to India and Indians and I am very loyal to it. But something was amiss in The Namesake. I would recommend it to potential readers, it has its good moments and you might be able to point out that one beautiful thing about the book that I missed.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Book Review. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Jhumpa Lahiri’s The Namesake

  1. mrinal says:

    ” Lahiri does not explore why Gogol is so dissatisfied with his life.” – Very True! U hv to put ur imagination cap to understand his aloofness. It is a good story but did u notice there isn’t any happy moment in their family? Gogol’s attitude towards his parents is not at all acceptable…His life is totally screwed but I ended up sympathizing Ashima. One of the reasons I liked ‘The Namesake’ was – It is believable.. I just cannot handle any fanatasy!

  2. Ash says:

    I liked the book, not as much as the reviewers did, but perhaps more than you.

    The best parts of the book certainly were the parts dealing with Ashima, in the very beginning and in the very end. Do you think it’s because we can somewhat identify with her as first-generation immigrants ? I could feel her struggle with her new life in a strange country, and the perpetual homesickness. And I could also identify with her realization in the end that home was no longer India, but here in the US, the home she made with her husband.

  3. Ash says:

    Btw, nice wordpress theme !

  4. sampada says:

    Mrinal, exactly what did you think in the story was believable?

    Ash, you’re right about why we might like Ashima more than Gogol. I don’t identify with Gogol and his dual identity, moreover, I think he is maudlin about his problems and hated it when he stole the limelight away from Ashima. I really think I would’ve appreciated the book had Ashima been the central character all through.

  5. HC says:

    You echo my exact sentiments when you say “I love literature related to India and Indians and I am very loyal to it. But something was amiss in The Namesake.” I very much want to like Lahiri and be excited about her work. I see the potential and it frustrates me no end that she does not make the most of the gifts she has. Same deal with Unaccustomed Earth. Maybe some day she’ll get it right at least one hopes so…

  6. sampada says:

    It’s just unfortunate that Lahiri has garnered so much attention here. Although I’m happy that there is *some* attention being given to Indian literature (even if it’s American Indian), I can’t help but think of the numerous wonderful writers that are so ignored. Amitav Ghosh, for one.

  7. Pingback: Jhumpa Lahiri’s Unaccustomed Earth « Sémantique

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s